1603 London plague

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1603 London plague
King James I's coronation ceremony was held on 25 July 1603 despite the plague.
DiseasePlague
Bacteria strainYersinia pestis
LocationLondon, England
Date1603–1604
Deaths
23,045[1]~35,000[2]

The 1603 London plague epidemic was the first of the 17th century and marked the transition from the Tudor to the Stuart period.

While sources vary as to the exact number of people killed, around one-fifth of London's population is estimated to have died.[3] While the plague affected all parts of the city, it disproportionately impacted London's poorer parishes.[2]

London in 1603[edit]

Migration from rural areas and London's high birth rates[4] helped the population recover from the 1592–1593 plague, with an average of 6000 christenings a year leading up to 1603.[5] The death of Queen Elizabeth I in March and the ascension of King James immediately triggered large amounts of travel to London. Mourners and merchants alike flooded the city to both remember the Queen and to sell tobacco, wine, and other merchandise to the throngs of travelers.[4]

Patchy sanitation by city authorities and an abundance of organic litter in the impoverished neighborhoods fueled a large rat population within the city walls, where one-third of London lived. Two-thirds of London's population resided in the crowded, unsanitary, and poorly-governed parishes known as "liberties"[6] which surrounded the walls and extended into the countryside.[6] Like every London plague since 1563, the 1603 epidemic began in the liberties.[4]

Plague in London[edit]

Urban black rats were common and flea bites regularly happened on city streets.

London's outer parish of Stepney was the first to record cases of bubonic plague shortly after the funeral of Queen Elizabeth.[7] The first plague of Stuart England disrupted the coronation of James I, which contemporaries found foreboding for the new king's reign.[8] The disease crept west towards London, and on 1 May deaths were being recorded just outside the city's northern walls in St Botolph-without-Bishopsgate.[9]

The plague spread quickly but stealthily through the large rat populations that lived off the filth. Local physician Thomas Lodge writes in his Treatise of the Plague that "For where the infestation most rageth, poverty reigns among the Commons..."[10] Orders to shutter theatres were given and remained in place for nearly a year.[11]

By summer the plague had begun to interfere more with daily life. The Trinity law sessions were suspended on June 23, and by July 10 most people were avoiding St Paul's Cathedral.[4] The coronation of James VI and Anne of Denmark went ahead on 25 July.[12]

650 of 674 deaths during September in Stepney parish were from the plague.[13] The plague was particularly lethal to younger people in St. Botolph's, with the parish recording 979 deaths of individuals between one and 24 years old.[9] The royal family and court moved to Winchester and Wilton House, in the belief that these areas were more healthy.[14]

During the Elizabethan years, London's theatres were closed to slow the spread of the plague. Public attitudes towards theatregoing and actors soured as these venues became associated with the epidemic.[11] The closures disrupted the careers of playwrights like William Shakespeare and Thomas Dekker, the latter of whom felt inspired by the turbulence to write The Wonderfull Yeare.

In March 1604, the plague was said to be "stayed in the city and suburbs", and people now came to London "without fear or hurt". One of the last casualties was a servant of Anne of Denmark, a quarter waiter called Watson. A Royal Entry to London, deferred from the July coronation, was held on 15 April 1604.[15]

Aftermath[edit]

London's government became more aware of the link between the city's recurring plague outbreaks and the filth that blighted the city.[16] While plague could and did strike any class, poor populations where dirty conditions prevailed had suffered greater losses than the cleaner areas of the city. When news of London's plague subsiding reached the countryside, opportunistic traders quickly moved from rural areas to London to fill in the void left by those who'd deceased or fled. London's status as England's economic powerhouse continued despite semi-generational plague epidemics like 1603.[5] The 1603 epidemic even influenced the King James Bible as King James, like many of his contemporaries, interpreted the disease to be a weapon of God's anger: "Behold, with a great plague with the Lord smite... a great catastrophe that could strike a city."[17]

The plague remained endemic in London with outbreaks of varying virulence returning in the years that followed. London's Bills of Mortality for the middle of the decade show 900 plague deaths in 1604, 400 in 1605, and a spike to 2000 plague deaths in 1606.[18]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Moote, A. Lloyd (2006). Great Plague : the Story of London's Most Deadly Year. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 10. ISBN 9780801892301.
  2. ^ a b Kohn, George Childs; Burns, William (2021). Encyclopedia of plague and pestilence (Fourth ed.). New York, N.Y. p. 327. ISBN 9781646937691.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  3. ^ Cummins, Neil; Kelly, Morgan; Ó Gráda, Cormac (2016). "Living standards and plague in London, 1560-1665: Living Standards and Plague in London". The Economic History Review. 69 (1): 3–34. doi:10.1111/ehr.12098.
  4. ^ a b c d Traill, Henry Duff; Mann, James Saumarez (1902). Social England: 1509-1603. Cassell, limited. pp. 764–766.
  5. ^ a b Birch, Thomas (1759). A Collection of the Yearly Bills of Mortality, from 1657 to 1758 Inclusive: Together with Several Other Bills of an Earlier Date. London: A. Millar. p. 90.
  6. ^ a b Creighton, Charles (1891). A History of Epidemics in Britain: From A.D. 664 to the extinction of plague. Cambridge University Press. pp. 474–477. Retrieved 15 July 2019.
  7. ^ Traill D.C.L, H.D.; Mann M.A, J.S., eds. (1903). Social England, A Record of the Progress of the People in Religion, Laws, Learning, Arts, Industry, Commerce, Science, Literature and Manners, from the Earliest Times to the Present Day. Vol. 3. London: Cassel and Company Limited. pp. 206–207. Retrieved 1 July 2019.
  8. ^ The Stuarts: A Bloody Reign, Part 1 (Video). 2018. 8:08-8:15 minutes in.
  9. ^ a b Hollingsworth, Mary F.; Hollingsworth, T. H. (1971). "Plague Mortality Rates by Age and Sex in the Parish of St. Botolph's without Bishopsgate, London, 1603". Population Studies. 25 (1): 131–146. doi:10.2307/2172754. ISSN 0032-4728. JSTOR 2172754. PMID 22091721.
  10. ^ Lodge, Thomas (1853). A Deference of Poetry, Music, and Stage Plays. London: The Shakespear Society.
  11. ^ a b Totaro, Rebecca; Gilman, Ernest B. (2010-09-13). Representing the Plague in Early Modern England. New York: Routledge. p. 55. ISBN 978-1-136-96324-7.
  12. ^ Jemma Field, 'Anna of Denmark', Aidan Norrie, Carolyn Harris, J. L. Laynesmith, Danna R. Messer, Elena Woodacre, Tudor and Stuart Consorts: Power, Influence, and Dynasty (Palgrave Macmillan, 2022), p. 214.
  13. ^ Creighton, Charles (1891). A History of Epidemics in Britain: From A.D. 664 to the extinction of plague. Cambridge University Press. pp. 478–479. Retrieved 15 July 2019.
  14. ^ Edmund Lodge, Illustrations of British History, vol. 3 (London, 1838), p. 36.
  15. ^ Trevelyan Papers, 3 (London: Camden Society, 1872), pp. 62–63.
  16. ^ Fritze, Ronald H.; Robison, William B.; Robison, William; ROBISON, WM B. (1996). Historical Dictionary of Stuart England, 1603-1689. London: Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 206. ISBN 978-0-313-28391-8.
  17. ^ Porter, Stephen. "Disease and the City 17th Century: Plague". Gresham College. Retrieved 28 November 2019.
  18. ^ Rees, Abraham (1819). The Cyclopædia, Or, Universal Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, and Literature. London: A. Strahan. p. 492.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1603_London_plague&oldid=1219235343"