Chaytor's Force

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chaytor's Force
Active13 August – 31 October 1918
CountryBritish Empire
AllegianceBritish Crown
TypeMounted Infantry
Infantry
Artillery
SizeReinforced Division of 11,000
Part ofDesert Mounted Corps
Egyptian Expeditionary Force
EngagementsFirst World War
Commanders
Notable
commanders
Edward Chaytor

Chaytor's Force (13 August – 31 October 1918[1]) named after its commander, Major General Edward Chaytor, was a composite division-sized force which served in the British Egyptian Expeditionary Force during the Sinai and Palestine Campaign of the First World War. The force of 11,000 men, consisted of a division headquarters, three mounted and one infantry brigades, four independent infantry battalions and four artillery batteries[2][3] and was detached from the Desert Mounted Corps for deception operations.[4][nb 1]

Chaytor's Force was formed to deceive the Ottoman high command into thinking the whole Desert Mounted Corps was positioned on the British right flank. They created dummy camps, guns positions and horses.[13] Mules were used to drag branches along tracks, making dust, imitating the movement of mounted troops. Each day infantry marched into the Jordan Valley, and was driven out by trucks by night, to suggest a buildup of troops.[14] Later it was primary responsible for the defence of the Egyptian Expeditionary Force's right flank, from the northern end of the Dead Sea to a point 8 miles (13 km) north-west of Jericho where the force touched the XX Corps. Chaytor's Force faced the Turkish Fourth Army, until that army was forced to retreat as a consequence of the successes of the Battles of Sharon and Nablus.[15]

Operations[edit]

Prisoners taken by Chaytor's Force

Chaytor's orders from the GOC Edmund Allenby were to "be vigilant, and ready at any moment to take the offensive". By demonstration and pressure he was to "prevent the enemy withdrawing troops to reinforce other parts of the line or concentrate against the XX Corps; to use every endeavour to protect the right flank of the XX Corps when it advanced; and, if the Turks reduced their strength in the Jordan valley, he was to advance to the bridge at Jisr ed Damieh, and be ready to move east across the Jordan on Es Salt and Amman, where he was to co-operate with the Arabs".[16]

Between 19 and 20 September while the main Battle of Sharon and attack by XX Corps developed, Chaytor's Force held their right and the Jordan Valley against the Fourth Army, while carrying out active demonstrations.[17] The 2nd Battalion British West Indies Regiment's advances towards Bakr Ridge were consolidated and continued at dawn on 20 September while the 2nd Light Horse Brigade and Patiala Infantry advanced eastwards across the Jordan Valley towards Shunet Nimrin.[18][19]

On 21 September when the retreat of the Fourth Army had begun, the main line of retreat for the Eighth and Seventh Armies in the Judean Hills east to the Jordan Valley was cut at Kh Fasail by the Auckland Mounted Rifles Regiment. They were joined by the remainder of the New Zealand Mounted Rifles Brigade for the attack on Jisr ed Damieh, the main bridge over the Jordan River being used by the retreating Ottoman columns.[20][21][22][23]

On 22 September the headquarters of the Ottoman 53rd Division were captured at El Makhruk and the line of retreat along the Nablus road was cut. With the threat of being overwhelmed by large Ottoman forces withdrawing towards Jisr ed Damieh bridge, the New Zealand Mounted Rifles Brigade and a company of 1st Battalion British West Indies Regiment attacked the bridge with a squadron of Auckland mounted Rifles Regiment charging across the bridge to pursue and capture many prisoners.[21][24][25]

The fords crossing the River Jordan at Umm esh Shert and Mafid Jozele were also captured on 22 September by the 2nd Battalion British West Indies Regiment with the 3rd Light Horse Regiment after the 38th Royal Fusiliers captured the Mellaha position in the Jordan Valley.[26][27]

Chaytor's Force crossed the Jordan River on their advance to Es Salt on 23 September which was captured in the evening after capturing rearguards.[28][29] Chaytor's Force advanced towards Amman which was attacked and captured on 25 September.[30] At Ziza on 28 September Chaytor's Force captured the Fourth Army's Southern Force.[31][32][33]

The first units from Chaytor's Force had crossed the Jordan River on 22 September and by 2 October had captured Amman, taken 10,332 prisoners of war, fifty-seven artillery guns, 147 machine guns, eleven railway engines, 106 railway carriages or trucks, and 142 vehicles.[34][35]

Order of battle[edit]

Composition of Chaytor's Force in September 1918. All details from MacMunn and Falls (1996), app3, p. 673 unless indicated.[36]

The following units were also attached to Chaytor's Force but are not included in the Official History order of battle:

  • Detachment, No. 35 Army Troops Company, Royal Engineers[37]
    • 26th Machine Gun Squadron[12]
    • A/263rd Battery, RFA[37]
    • Nos. 96, 102, 103 anti-aircraft sections, Royal Artillery[37]
    • 2 Sections captured Ottoman 75 mm guns
    • 1 Section captured Ottoman 59 mm guns.[38]

Also included was a transport echelon of 300 donkeys, seventeen tractors, thirty-four trucks, five ammunition lorries and fourteen supply lorries. The Desert Mounted Corps and the infantry XX and XXI Corps had by comparison, thirty and 120 ammunition and supply lorries for the mounted corps to sixty and 180 ammunition and supply lorries for the infantry corps.[39]

Notes[edit]

Footnotes

  1. ^ Chaytor's Force was larger than a mounted but smaller than an infantry division, which had around 20,000 men.[5] Jukes describes it as a small mobile force.[6] Basil Liddle Hart described it as the "ANZAC Mounted Division, reinforced by a few infantry battalions".[7] In An Outline History of the Great War its described as the "ANZAC Mounted Division, with a contingent of infantry equivalent to two brigades".[8] Woodward in Hell in the Holy Land describes it as the "ANZAC Mounted Division, the 20th Indian Infantry Brigade and some other units".[9] Paddy Griffith in The Great War calls it "a reinforced cavalry division",[10] Bou describes it as "nearly equivalent to two divisions."[11] The force had a ration strength of "8,000 British, 3,000 Indian, 500 Egyptian Camel Transport Corps on 30 September".[12]

Citations

  1. ^ Chappell 2008 p.411
  2. ^ Kinloch 2007 p.321
  3. ^ Sumner 2010 p.10
  4. ^ a b General Edmund Allenby (4 February 1922). "Supplement to the London Gazette, 4 February, 1920" (PDF). The London Gazette. Retrieved 29 August 2012.
  5. ^ Baker, Chris. "The British order of battle of 1914–1918". The Long Long Trail. Retrieved 29 August 2012.
  6. ^ Jukes 2003 p.307
  7. ^ Hart 1989 p.276
  8. ^ Carey and Scott 2011 p.238
  9. ^ Woodward 2006 p.199
  10. ^ Griffiths 2003 p.96
  11. ^ Bou 2009 p. 194
  12. ^ a b Anzac Mounted Division Admin Staff, Headquarters War Diary 30 September 1918 AWM4-1-61-31
  13. ^ Perrett 1999 p.39
  14. ^ Horner, Chapter: "Deceiving the Turks"
  15. ^ Falls & MacMunn 1996, p. 547.
  16. ^ Gullett 1941, p. 714.
  17. ^ Wavell 1968 p. 220
  18. ^ Falls & MacMunn 1996, p. 549.
  19. ^ War Diary of Anzac Mounted Division AWM4-1-60-31part2 Appendix 38 pp. 2–3
  20. ^ War Diary of New Zealand Mounted Rifles Brigade AWM4-35-12-41
  21. ^ a b War Diary of Anzac Mounted Division AWM4-1-60-31part2 Appendix 38 p. 3
  22. ^ Falls & MacMunn 1996, p. 550.
  23. ^ Powles 1922 p. 245
  24. ^ Falls & MacMunn 1996, p. 551.
  25. ^ Powles 1922 pp. 246–7
  26. ^ Diary of Anzac Mounted Division AWM4-1-60-31part2 Appendix 38 pp. 3–4
  27. ^ Falls & MacMunn 1996, pp. 551–552.
  28. ^ Powles 1922 p. 248
  29. ^ Falls & MacMunn 1996, pp. 553–554.
  30. ^ Powles 1922 pp. 251–2
  31. ^ Powles 1922 pp. 254–5
  32. ^ Kinloch 2007 p. 318
  33. ^ Falls & MacMunn 1996, p. 555.
  34. ^ "Edward Chaytor". First World War.com. Retrieved 28 August 2012.
  35. ^ Powles 1922 p.256
  36. ^ Falls & MacMunn 1996, p. 673.
  37. ^ a b c Powles 1922 p.236
  38. ^ Anzac Mounted Division General Staff War Diary AWM4-1-60-31part2Appendix 38 p. 1
  39. ^ Perrett 1999 p.36

References[edit]

  • Carey, G. V.; Scott, H. S. (2011). An Outline History of the Great War. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-64802-9.
  • Chappell, Brad (2008). The Regimental Warpath 1914–1918. Ravi Rikhye. ISBN 978-0-9776072-7-3.
  • Macmunn, G. F.; Falls, C. (1996) [1930]. Military Operations Egypt & Palestine: From June 1917 to the End of the War. History of the Great War based on Official Documents by Direction of the Committee of Imperial Defence. Vol. II. Part II (Imperial War Museum and Battery Press repr. ed.). London: HMSO. ISBN 978-0-89839-240-1.
  • Griffiths, William R. (2003). The Great War, The West Point Military History Series. Square One. ISBN 978-0-7570-0158-1.
  • Gullett, H. S. (1941). Sinai and Palestine: The Australian Imperial Force in Sinai and Palestine, 1914–1918. Official History of Australia in the War of 1914–1918. Vol. VII (10th ed.). Official History of Australia in the War of 1914–1918. OCLC 271462411. Retrieved 14 September 2017.
  • Horner, David (2010). Australia's Military History for Dummies. no page numbers. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-74246-894-5.
  • Jukes, Geoffrey (2003). The First World War: The War To End All Wars. Essential Histories Specials. Vol. II. Oxford: Osprey. ISBN 978-1-84176-738-3.
  • Kinloch, Terry (2007). Devils on Horses: In the Words of the Anzacs in the Middle East 1916–19. Exisle Publishing. ISBN 978-0-908988-94-5.
  • Liddell Hart, Basil (1989). Lawrence of Arabia. The Perseus Books Group. ISBN 978-0-306-80354-3.
  • Perrett, Bryan (1999). Megiddo 1918: The Last Great Cavalry Victory. Oxford: Osprey. ISBN 978-1-85532-827-3.
  • Powles, C. Guy; A. Wilkie (1922). The New Zealanders in Sinai and Palestine. Official History New Zealand's Effort in the Great War. Vol. III. Auckland, NZ: Whitcombe & Tombs. OCLC 2959465.
  • Sumner, David (2001). The Indian Army 1914–1947. Oxford: Osprey. ISBN 978-1-84176-196-1.
  • Woodward, David R. (2006). Hell in the Holy Land: World War I in the Middle East. University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 978-0-8131-2383-7.