David M. Gunn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
David Gunn
Born
David Miller Gunn
Academic background
Alma materUniversity of Melbourne
University of Otago
Newcastle University
Academic work
Sub-disciplineHebrew Bible
Old Testament
InstitutionsTexas Christian University (current)
University of Sheffield
Columbia Theological Seminary

David Miller Gunn is an academic and religious scholar. He is the A. A. Bradford Professor of Religion at Texas Christian University.[1]

Education[edit]

Gunn studied at the University of Melbourne, the University of Otago, and Newcastle University.

Career[edit]

He has served as a professor of Religious Studies at the University of Sheffield and at Columbia Theological Seminary.

In collaboration with biblical scholar David J. A. Clines, Gunn made the University of Sheffield a leading institution in literary readings of the final form of the biblical text. Followers of this approach are sometimes referred to as the "Sheffield school".[2] According to Ken Stone, Gunn's 1978 work, The Story of King David: Genre and Interpretation, has become "one of the most influential early attempts at a 'literary' approach to the Hebrew Bible."[3]

Gunn has enjoyed a successful association with Danna Nolan Fewell, with whom he has co-authored several articles and three books: Compromising Redemption: Relating Characters in the Book of Ruth; Gender, Power, and Promise: The Subject of the Bible's First Story; and Narrative in the Hebrew Bible. Fewell and Gunn represent a postmodern literary approach to biblical literature.[4][5]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "David M. Gunn". Texas Christian University. Retrieved 30 November 2014.
  2. ^ David J. A. Clines, Stephen E. Fowl, and Stanley E. Porter, "Preface," in The Bible in Three Dimensions: Essays in Celebration of Forty Years of Biblical Studies in the University of Sheffield, p. 14.
  3. ^ Ken Stone, Sex, Honor, and Power in the Deuteronomistic History, p. 16.
  4. ^ Adele Berlin, "Literary Approaches to Biblical Literature: General Observations and a Case Study of Genesis 34," in The Hebrew Bible: New Insights and Scholarship, p. 57.
  5. ^ David Penchansky, The Politics of Biblical Theology: A Postmodern Reading, p. 86.