Josephus was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia articles
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[Josephus on Jesus#Reference to Jesus as brother of James (xx 9.1)|James the brother of Jesus]] The anchor (#Reference to Jesus as brother of James (xx 9.1)) has been deleted by other users before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors
Josephus never had any alternate names, adding a patronym and a reconstructed modern translation doesn't create a new name. Academic sources overwhelmingly refer to him as simply Josephus, and your general topic sources obviously don't qualify. See also MOS:LEADCLUTTER. Avilich (talk) 18:16, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The lead of this article begins with “Flavius Josephus”. But he did not take the name Flavius until A.D. 69. Before then he was called something else beyond merely Josephus, because “Josephus” would have been inadequate to identify him and distinguish him from the many many other people in his community named Josephus. I have just reduced clutter in the lead per your suggestion.[1] Anythingyouwant (talk) 19:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
His name was always simply Josephus, and what he used to distinguish himself is irrelevant: lots of ancient cultures used patronymics, but these should not feature in the lede unless they are used commonly and non-trivially in English sources. Reliable sources like the Oxford Classical Dictionary and Brill's Pauly call him simply Josephus, not "Yosef" or "Ben Matityahu". General topic sources like Making History: The Storytellers Who Shaped the Past written by non-specialists are not generally reliable and should be avoided. Avilich (talk) 19:32, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t understand why you’re not objecting to the first word of the lead: Flavius. If we include Flavius in the lead, then it seems obvious we should also include Matityahu, because the former supplanted the latter. The title of this article makes clear that the predominant name is simply Josephus, but it’s very typical for a lead to give fuller names. Many Wikipedia BLP leads begin with a full name including middle name, even though almost no one knows the middle name, and that’s fine, we want the lead to include a fuller name if there is a fuller name than the article title. Anythingyouwant (talk) 19:50, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Once again, he never "supplanted" any name and was never called "Matityahu". Your basis for assuming this is unsupported by reliable sources. There is nothing more to add aside from the "Flavius Josephus" that was already in place before your edits. Avilich (talk) 20:14, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Look at the opening sentence in the lead of Cher. Did you know her last name was Sarkisian? Almost no one knows that. But that was her name before she got famous. Same with Josephus. As Goodman says, before Josephus got famous, he was “the young Judean priest Yosef ben Matityahu”. Of course the patronymic had to be used or else no one would have known which Yosef was being referred to. I’m not highly invested in whether we mention the full name Yosef ben Matityahu but it does seem very well-sourced, accurate, and typical for Wikipedia articles. Anythingyouwant (talk) 22:27, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Goodman says nothing of the sort, your quote is out of context, and your example is anachronistic. We should give WP:DUE weight to what the totality of published reliable sources say, and the weight given to your preferred name is basically zero (and Goodman himself uses the term no more than 3 times), so I'm removing it. Avilich (talk) 23:03, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Should his full Jewish name Yosef ben Matityahu be mentioned in lead sentence?[edit]
In the lead sentence, his Roman name (Flavius Josephus) is recited, which he adopted in A.D. 69. Before then he had a Jewish name, which I think also ought to be given in the lead sentence, so that the lead sentence would read as follows:
“
Flavius Josephus (/dʒoʊˈsiːfəs/;[1]Greek: Ἰώσηπος, Iṓsēpos; c. AD 37 – c. 100), earlier known as Yosef ben Matityahu,[2] was a 1st-century Roman–Jewishhistorian and military leader.
The full Jewish name is not as well known as the Roman Josephus (or Flavius Josephus), but it is standard practice for Wikipedia to include birth name in lead sentence, see e.g. Cher. This matter was discussed in the preceding talk page section, but that section started before the proposed version was developed (i.e. before the Goodman source was added, and before another version of Josephus’s name was removed). Anythingyouwant (talk) 23:26, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Per MOS:BIOFIRSTSENTENCE, “The name of a person is presented in full if known, including any given names that were abbreviated or omitted in the article's title. For example, the article on Calvin Coolidge gives his name as John Calvin Coolidge Jr. If a person changed their full name at some point after birth, the birth name may be given as well, if relevant.” It is relevant because he was a Jew who became a Roman so both the Jewish and Roman names are correct and provide a fuller picture of the subject. Anythingyouwant (talk) 23:31, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
He never changed his name of birth aside from adding a Latin name. Patronymics were common at the time, but virtually no Wikipedia article includes them in the lede unless it's part of an official naming convention. It should not be added in the present article either. The proposed addition is not his "full Jewish name", and is only mentioned by a statistically meaningless number of English sources. Avilich (talk) 00:05, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So, in your opinion, we should make sure the lead paragraph never mentions the Jewish name “Yosef” that he was born with, but only the Roman name he used later in life? Should we also delete the following footnote from the article?
“
Ben-Ari, Nitsa (2003). "The double conversion of Ben-Hur: a case of manipulative translation"(PDF). Target. 14 (2): 263–301. doi:10.1075/target.14.2.05ben. Retrieved 28 November 2011. The converts themselves were banned from society as outcasts and so was their historiographic work or, in the more popular historical novels, their literary counterparts. Josephus Flavius, formerly Yosef Ben Matityahu (34–95), had been shunned, then banned as a traitor.
I would put ‘Jewish traitor” in the lead. Agree? Riskit 4 a biskit (talk) 08:08, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
An IP added the full Jewish name with patronymic in the lead,[2] so I restored just the Jewish name without the patronymic,[3] because the patronymic seems to be the point of contention. Anythingyouwant (talk) 22:30, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
