Talk:Qareen
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||
| |||||||||||
NPOV question[edit]
This article, especially toward the end, has the feel of having been written with a certain religious fervor. I question whether that conflicts with NPOV, and needs editing for that. Johanna-Hypatia (talk) 20:04, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
qarīn[edit]
Since Mohammed was sent as a prophet to Jinn communities as well as the Human communities and since the Jinn have free will, it stands to reasons that every qarin has the choice to become a believer. Allah would not have sent a messenger to the Jinn and qarin unless there was the possibility of converts. Just as Hud was only able to save a few people of 'Ad, Allah would send a messenger to Jinn even if only a few would convert. That only Mohammed's Qarin became a believer makes no sense. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 16:44, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Qareen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160401074754/http://islamcan.com/jinn-stories/we-all-have-a-jinn-companion.shtml to http://www.islamcan.com/jinn-stories/we-all-have-a-jinn-companion.shtml/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:48, 21 July 2016 (UTC)