Talk:Seti I

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Removed text: This temple was Seti's idea, on which he worked for a long time but could not end, nor could Rameses II.

Reason: Seti I was after Hatshepsut who also contributed to Karnak SKL

"Search for Omm Sety" This is a great book about a British woman born in the early 1900's who believed that she was a reincarnated Egyptian woman who lived during the reign of Sety I. Though most of the book follows her life she lives in Abydos and studies Egyptology, making many contributions thanks to her "special" knowledge of the time and the king Sety himself, whom she believed she had a romantic relationship with. The book is definitely worth the read if you are interested in this time period.

pop culture[edit]

Isn't Seti I identified as Pharaoh of Egypt during the enslavement of the Hebrews in the Ten Commandments movie(with Heston)? I believe he is also the 1999 movie "The Mummy" briefly. I think this pop culture references deserve a mention. Kerowyn 12:29, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Co Regency with Rameses[edit]

I find it funny that people question it happened, a Co-Regencey is the only way Ramses could have reigned over 60 years as claimed, since he was only in his 60s when he died as his Mummy shows. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.144.34.210 (talk) 06:32, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a forum where we all express our own opinions on the general subject, but if you find a RS expressing those same views that you hold, then it might mean something quotable. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 12:19, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Relationships[edit]

This article says that Seti I was the son of Ramesses I, but the article on Ramesses I says that Seti I was Ramesses I's son. Which is it? DreamersRose (talk) 21:33, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DreamersRose, I don't understand your question. The way you put it the articles agree. Dougweller (talk) 13:21, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Seti I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:36, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clarity on damnatio memoriae[edit]

It needs clarifying that damnatio memoriae was only organised against Tutankhamun regarding monuments and scriptures that bore the name of Tutankhaten only and not Tutankhamun. There is no sourcing or references to this? Why not? Information such as that needs to be backed up as per wiki rules. Ts4221 (talk) 16:14, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]