User talk:CountMacula

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edit to Webster County, Iowa. Just a note that citations are not placed into section headings, per WP:CITEFOOT. Cheers! Magnolia677 (talk) 09:59, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of National Educational Development Tests[edit]

Hello, CountMacula,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Raydann, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, National Educational Development Tests, for deletion, because it is a very short article that doesn't provide readers with enough context to determine who or what the subject is.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Raydann}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 08:45, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article National Educational Development Tests has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, does not indicate which country and does not establish notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BostonMensa (talk) 13:31, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I just wanted to give you a fair heads up that I reverted your edit here. Because Alex McKinney is a living person, the full force of MOS:GENDERID applies. Specifically, [I]f a living transgender or non-binary person was not notable under a former name (a deadname), it should not be included in any page (including lists, redirects, disambiguation pages, category names, templates, etc.), even in quotations, even if reliable sourcing exists.. As such, I think the guidelines is pretty explicit that McKinney's birth name shouldn't be mentioned.--Jerome Frank Disciple (talk) 13:05, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your revert, with the comment: The condition "if a living transgender or non-binary person was not notable under a former name (a deadname)" is false, as McKinney was notable at the time of trial under the legal name Maya Elizabeth McKinney. So MOS:GENDERID doesn't apply.
Thanks for your previous merge with the other article, BTW. CountMacula (talk) 05:00, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A web search for "Maya Elizabeth McKinney" reveals mention of that name in dozens of reliable secondary sources. I believe that that establishes notability under that name. CountMacula (talk) 05:04, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough! For the reasons I've now stated on the talk page, I think the status quo should stay into effect until the question is resolved. But I've now added a section to that talk page summarizing the dispute so that other editors can chip in. If we don't get any responses, we can head to WP:3O (to get a third opinion) or, if necessary, ask for a request for comment.--Jerome Frank Disciple (talk) 13:51, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay! I had a message typed up here, but, as happens too often, it got lost in tabs, and I somehow convinced myself I had already hit save until I stumbled on it again. I just wanted to give you a heads up that I put the dispute on WP:3O, so hopefully we'll get the input of another editor soon-ish. (And, of course, if that opinion doesn't satisfyingly resolve the issue, we can go somewhere else, like WP:RFC.)--Jerome Frank Disciple (talk) 17:20, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]