User talk:Keivan.f

This is Keivan.f's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10: 31 days

Welcome to Keivan.f's talk page. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article's talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or let me know where specifically you'd prefer the reply. I will try to WP:PING you as well. Conversely if you are replying to something I've said on another talk page, reply there and include {{ping|Keivan.f}} to alert me.

Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words.

It is 7:52 AM where this user lives. ^(Purge)

Collaboration 2[edit]

@Keivan.f It would be appreciated if you could take over the GA review for Karlie Kloss which I recently re-nominated. It has been quickfailed by the previous reviewer whose comments have been taken care of. Regards MSincccc (talk) 06:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not familiar with the topic, so I would not feel comfortable picking it up. Better leave it to someone who's actually interested in it. Keivan.f^Talk 18:01, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Keivan.f But wasn't that the criteria for becoming a reviewer? Anyways, the article's way shorter in comparison to those which you have regularly contributed to and is written in American English, something with which I am not familiar being British. I have already made a number of revisions in accordance with the previous reviewer's comments including cutting out uncited or poorly sourced material. Even the parameters are accurate. If you could only look into it once, I would greatly appreciate it. In the meantime, I was considering taking up Aishwarya Rai Bachchan's GA nomination if you are not against it. I will be going through it soon when I have the time. Regards and yours faithfully, MSincccc (talk) 18:35, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am recovering from an injury at the moment, which is why I'm not that active these days. If my health permits, I will pick the article up for review, but at the moment I'm afraid I won't be able to handle it due to lack of stamina. Will try and see if I can do anything about it a couple of days from now. Keivan.f^Talk 15:37, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Get well soon and return stronger than ever (like Catherine will). Meanwhile, NickD had posted his comments in the peer review, which I have efficiently addressed. Regards MSincccc (talk) 05:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Keivan.f While I understand that you're currently recuperating from an injury, I hope you wouldn't mind responding to Aaron Liu's suggestion on Catherine's talk page (where you are among the users pinged). His edit seems vague and unnecessary to me. It also fails WP:Proseline and needlessly mentions unwanted dates, essentially repeating already known information. Do leave a comment if possible (there). Regards MSincccc (talk) 06:17, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I have trimmed down the "Mother's Day Photograph" section of Catherine's article though I have retained some information regarding the inconsistencies and citations to support it. Just let me know in your response to this message whether the changes are fine, in your accord, as the section already points to the section of the same name in the article Where is Kate? Regards MSincccc (talk) 07:03, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly looks better compared to what it was before. I restored a source and made a sentence shorter. Keivan.f^Talk 07:16, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase "which she announced on the 22nd" would be eliminated given the language itself (see "22nd" has been used). I anticipate a robust response from your end, potentially resolving a discussion initiated by an edit made by user AaronLiu. Regards and yours faithfully, MSincccc (talk) 14:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind assisting me in bringing the discussion initiated by AaronLiu to a definitive conclusion? I've added "early" before "March 2024," but AaronLiu continues to suggest adding "which she announced on the 22nd" to the end of the paragraph, which is clearly not appropriate. Furthermore, the user argues that a poor phrase is better than nothing, which seems like a questionable justification for edits on a prominent public figure's Wikipedia article. I look forward to your response. Regards MSincccc (talk) 07:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If they insist on adding a time frame, you can use "which she announced on 22 March". Personally I don't have any strong feelings on this particular matter. Keivan.f^Talk 16:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you're interested in achieving GA status for the Prince Harry article, I'm keen to assist. We could co-nominate, as I've recently focused on ensuring the article's consistency and would like to be recognized with the GA as much as you being its second largest contributor. I hope you're open to this proposal. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 09:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MSincccc: If it's your intention to co-nominate, you should indicate it as such in the notes (follow the instructions at WP:GAN/I#N3 on how to add a note). "Albert Wesker" is an example of an article that has been co-nominated recently. Keivan.f^Talk 14:19, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Keivan.f Currently, I am focusing on improving the prose and ensuring consistent and accurate citation parameters. I am working on this alone, but you are welcome to assist if you wish. I will notify you when the page is ready in a GA-ready format. I hope you are open to this approach. MSincccc (talk) 14:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had worked on the citations about 3 months ago, cleaning up most of the mess. It's good that somebody else is now also going over it to check for anything that might have been left unnoticed. Keivan.f^Talk 15:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was confirmed on 21 February 2020 that "Sussex Royal" would not be used as a brand name for the couple following their withdrawal from public life.[369] The Sussex Royal Foundation was renamed the "MWX Foundation" on 5 August 2020 and dissolved the same day. Reference number 370 should be checked, as the People Magazine article cited is dated as being published in July 2020. Regards MSincccc (talk) 18:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Keivan.f If your health has improved, would you please take up Mark Zuckerberg's article for GA review of which I am a significant author as well as editor. You had previously accepted my offer to review it. Looking forward to a positive response and have a great day. Regards MSincccc (talk) 08:40, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see if I can do so in the upcoming days since I gave you my word. I'm making progress but we'll see. Whether I end up picking it up or someone else, I'm sure you'll be able to handle it. Keivan.f^Talk 19:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 January 2020, Buckingham Palace announced that, following their decision to step back from royal duties, from 31 March 2020 the Duke and Duchess would not use their Royal Highness styles in practice. They are still referred to as "His/Her Royal Highness" in legal settings. This paragraph needs to be rephrased in order to comply with WP:Proseline and be consistent in its wording. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 17:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold and proceed with fixing any issues that you think need to be taken care of. You don't need anyone's approval to make the changes. Keivan.f^Talk 19:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article listing the official overseas visits made by Charles III is titled "List of official overseas trips made by Charles III." However, the article "List of official overseas trips made by William, Prince of Wales, and Catherine, Princess of Wales" includes visits made by William both before and after his marriage, as well as those made with Catherine and their solo visits. Unlike the article for William, the title of Charles' overseas visits article does not mention his wife's titles. Additionally, Camilla was never known as Princess of Wales. The phrase "alongside either of his wives prior to his accession..." is not accurate because the list also includes his solo visits, and the article title only mentions his name unlike the one for William, which includes Catherine's official titles. A more appropriate phrase would be-For the list of official overseas trips made by Charles III as Prince of Wales,... Looking forward to knowing from you soon. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 08:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of a redirect hatnote at the top of the page is to resolve confusion. The phrase "List of official overseas trips made by the Prince and Princess of Wales" is vague. It can refer to the current Prince and Princess of Wales or their predecessors. Charles is the only predecessor for whom we have an article covering his trips, which also include all of the overseas visits he made with either of his wives, both of whom were 'legally' Princess of Wales (1, 2). Keivan.f^Talk 12:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that you are not against me nominating the Earthshot Prize for GA status considering my personal involvement with the topic. As the second highest author and editor, with nearly 20% authorship, I am deeply invested in the quality and accuracy of the article. Your positive response and support would be greatly appreciated as I can then proceed with the GA nomination. Best regards. MSincccc (talk) 10:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I've said before you can go ahead with the nomination. Keivan.f^Talk 12:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zoroastrianism[edit]

@Keivan.f

Hello there. there is an ongoing dispute on Zoroastrianism talk page for 4 months now. Mainstream Zoroastrianism is Monotheistic, Zoroastrians themselves consider themselves Monotheistic and The majority of reliable sources also claim that Zoroastrianism is Monotheistic.

however there is a certain user who insists that Zoroastrianism is not Monotheistic. he Doesn't accept the arguments we provide, and insists on his own opinions which are not supported by the majority of articles and reliable sources we have provided.

as a result we have failed to reach a consensus for 4 month and the conflict is still ongoing. could you please come to Zoroastrianism talk page and discuss the matter and help us reach a consensus?

thank you. Researcher1988 (talk) 13:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Aishwarya Rai Bachchan[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Aishwarya Rai Bachchan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MSincccc -- MSincccc (talk) 06:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]