Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Al-Islam Wikiproject
Al-Islam Portal What is Islam? Indices Wikiproject Categories
Main pageAssessmentMembersArticlesNew articlesPortalHelp

Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Islam! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles related to Islam. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Islam}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Islam-related articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

WP:Islam article rating and assessment scheme
(NB: Listing, Log & Stats are updated on a daily basis by a bot)
Current detailed listing of Islam articles by quality
Daily log of status changes
Current Statistics
 FA A GABCStartStub FLListCategoryDisambigDraft FMFilePortalProjectRedirectTemplateNA???Total
3221458662,4344,8963,92523455,21312710817453301138374771749920,430
WikiProject Islam  articles by quality     Refresh
WikiProject Islam Articles by importance (refresh)
 Top  High  Mid  Low  NA  ??? Total
 246  384  1,506  8,737  7,065 2,494  20,432 


Frequently asked questions[edit]

How do I add an article to the WikiProject?
Just add {{WikiProject Islam}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
How can I get my article rated?
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles?
Any member of WikiProject Islam is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
What if I don't agree with a rating?
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective?
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use the peer review department (not yet available) instead. Please archive requests that are complete.

New requests[edit]

Please place new requests (in the format, # [[article name]] -- ~~~~) at the bottom of the list.

  • Said Nursi A new rating and feedback will be appreciated.rinduzahid(talk) 15:25, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Al-Fatiha Significantly added to the quality of the article, would appreciate quick assessment.HQEditor (talk) 15:14, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Abu Hanifa Mosque -- I would appreciate if this article gets reassessed because it was completely rebuilt and so much information was added tio it. Hashima20 (talk) 20:32, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Jizya -- New rating required. Article needs attention from other experts. Reeves.ca (talk) 03:07, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Jama Masjid, Delhi - a mosque article recently added to Wikiproject Islam. Though it has a good article rating from other projects, it is unassessed by this project. Gowhk8 (talk) 14:36, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Al Ameer son: how do you think this one? It seem it received GA in another Wikiprojects, but i think there is still lack some inline citations. Ahendra (talk) 23:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Sultan.abdullah.hindi: The article structure is good for starter article. However, there are several issues as it seems Luqman still lacked in-line citation for references. there should be more renowned reliable references to be included in this article.Ahendra (talk) 23:26, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Jama Mosque, Bijapur - Article has changed significantly since last rating in 2012, and received reassessment from other projects; it is however still classified as a stub by Wikiproject Islam, so requesting reassessment. Gowhk8 (talk) 22:24, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rahmah el Yunusiyah - recent article co-developed between me and another user; with some content taken and sourced from the ID wiki. I would be curious if anyone can check if I have the correct interpretation (and wikilinks) for some of the Islam related content and if possible give her obviously Arabic-derived name in Arabic at the top of the article. She was known in Egypt and some Islamic circles so I suspect the correct spelling must be out there in plenty of places. --Dan Carkner (talk) 16:46, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Instructions[edit]

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Islam}} template banner on its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax).

{{WikiProject Islam|class=XXX|importance=YYY}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Islam-related articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

The following values may be used for the importance parameter:

The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.

Quality scale[edit]

Importance scale[edit]

Participants[edit]

Please feel free to add your name to this list if you would like to join the assessment team (sign with ~~~ (3) instead of ~~~~ (4)).

Recognised Islam-related content[edit]

Featured articles[edit]

Former featured articles[edit]

Featured lists[edit]

Good articles[edit]

Former good articles[edit]

Did you know? articles[edit]

Featured pictures[edit]

Featured portals[edit]

Featured article candidates[edit]

Good article nominees[edit]

A-Class articles[edit]

In the News articles[edit]

Main page featured articles[edit]

Main page featured lists[edit]

Picture of the day pictures[edit]

Good topics[edit]


Log[edit]

The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here.