This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
"Cranach probably drew on input from his lifelong friend Martin Luther" - is input the right word here. It implies he consulted which I cant picture. Ceoil (talk) 02:42, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Noble says "in consultation with"... the "probably" is a hedge from other sources who hedge. Outriggr (talk) 02:45, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This role for religious art contrasted with pre-Reformation art of the recent past, such as Early Netherlandish and Italian Renaissance painting - Confused by "this role"; ie that that art actually played, or now how the Luther now saw it. Ceoil (talk) 02:48, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Outriggr,
In this edit, you mention the source "Nadel". However, there is no such source in the article. Do you remember if it could be a mispelling and it should be "Noble" instead? Daehan (talk) 10:03, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
