Talk:Limpet mine

Military history: Maritime / Technology / Weaponry

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Scuba diving Low‑importance

	Underwater diving portal This article is part of WikiProject Underwater diving, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Underwater diving-related articles to a feature-quality standard, and to comprehensively cover the topic with quality encyclopedic articles.Scuba divingWikipedia:WikiProject Scuba divingTemplate:WikiProject Scuba divingSCUBA articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Confused[edit]

This sentence

Normally they are directly attached, but the warhead of the human torpedo was linked to the magnets by wires about 1-foot (30 cm) long.

confuses me a little since the article is about limpet mines. Human torpedoes, except those used as suicide weapons, are small submarines used to transport one or two people on a covert mission. Human torpedoes do not seem to have commonly had a warhead.

It seems that the sentence was added back when the article was still part of the naval mine page [1] and may have been intended as a reference to a specific weapon system. If so that is unclear and I am reluctant to remove it without evidence. 75.69.0.58 (talk) 16:42, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is confusing:

"Limpet mines were first used by Italian divers in the sinking of the dreadnought SMS Viribus Unitis in Pula, 1 November 1918." "In December 1938, a new unit was created in the British military that soon became known as Military Intelligence (Research) — usually abbreviated as MI(R) or occasionally as MIR. MI(R) absorbed a technical section that was at first known as MI(R)c. In April 1939, Joe Holland, the head of MIR, recruited his old friend Major Millis Rowland Jefferis " "One of Jefferis' earliest ideas was for a type of mine that could be towed behind a rowboat, but which would attach itself to the hull of a ship that it passed. Getting a heavy bomb to stick to a ship reliably was a problem; the obvious answer was to use magnets which should be as powerful as possible." The phrasing on the article almost gives the appearance that it was invented in 1938/1939 but also mentions it was used during World War I — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.82.114.63 (talk) 01:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Magnets?[edit]

How necessary is the stipulation of magnetic adhesion? While magnets are the most common for such purpose-built military devices, glues and other adhesive schemes have been used for substantially the same purpose (for example, the explosive charge delivered by the Turtle was to have been attached by a screw); likewise, I'm sure there are provisions for using such devices on wooden or fiberglass hulls. If an expert on the terminology reads this, please clarify. Wyvern (talk) 00:53, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No expert, but glue has come a long way since the '30s (even since your own decade, probably). The association just stuck, pardon the pun, kind of like "the tube" still reminds people of flat rectangular TV. Tubes, magnets, gears, rakes and mirrors aren't exactly obsolete in practice, either, just not the most versatile tools in the shed. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:08, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit removed, why?[edit]

I'm not sure, if this is the right way and place for this question- I'm a total newbie here. My recent article edit was removed and I would like to know why. Here is the edit I made:

Another case was Raid on Alexandria on December 19, 1941 by Italian Navy divers, who attacked and disabled two Royal Navy battleships in the harbour of Alexandria, Egypt, using manned torpedoes.

Paul Jurczak (talk) 02:01, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions are welcome, but you need to provide citations. The link in your edit goes to a battle in 1812, perhaps not what you meant? Happy editing. Gaius Cornelius (talk) 23:15, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Limpet mine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120422053056/http://www.dva.gov.au/aboutDVA/publications/commemorative/jaywick/Pages/index.aspx to http://www.dva.gov.au/aboutDVA/publications/commemorative/jaywick/Pages/index.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:34, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Minor problem with lede.[edit]

The third paragraph keeps switching between present and past tense for no apparent reason. I'd correct it myself, but I don't know which tense is appropriate. JDZeff (talk) 20:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]