Talk:Miguel de Cervantes Prize

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled][edit]

I've gone through and made sure all of the winners (1976–2005) have the "Premio Cervantes winners" category. Sighrik 18:25, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nobel?[edit]

The page currently likens this award to the Nobel. Wouldn't a more apt comparison be something like the Booker or Pulitzer?

I agree, the Booker Prize is the most apt comparison. The Pulitzer is only for U.S. authors whereas the Booker is for English language novels. However, the fact that this prize is awarded for a body of work draws comparisons to the Nobel. Any change should reflect this difference. Doktor Waterhouse 08:50, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the Booker is only for english-written books by an author from the Commonwealth plus Ireland, whereas the Cervantes is meant for any spanish-writing author, no matter where he is from, so there may not be an exact equivalent to an english literature prize. Nonetheless, I think the article makes the point quite clear, by explaining that the Cervantes is awarded in regards of the whole work of the author, as the Nobel Prize is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.250.178.136 (talk) 17:25, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parraaclark.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Parraaclark.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:09, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Omissions and Potential candidates[edit]

Are these sections really necessary? Perhaps they would more meaningful if they resembled the Criticism section of Nobel Prize in Literature, but right now they seem to be mere speculations. (Please forgive me if my message is incomprehensible; not a native speaker.) 89.77.34.36 (talk) 18:08, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]