Talk:Refuge in Buddhism

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Refuge in Buddhism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buddhism Top‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Upanishads Reference[edit]

The article claims that the Tisarana(refuge chant) is derived from Rigveda. This is when the Buddha was not even born at the time when Rigveda was written. It claims that Rigveda mentions Buddham Saranam Gacchami , that too in Pali. This must rectified. The Buddha made it clear that he did not borrow teachings from any other source(Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta). The refuge chant is from the Pali Canon, not Rigveda or any other Brahmanical text. Bodhiupasaka (talk) 05:45, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bodhiupasaka: It's a Western scholar's opinion, clearly described as such, and cited. It will not be removed due to your dogmatic issues with it. Skyerise (talk) 14:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One western scholar's opinion does not make it a fact . History and any other modern fields of study is formed on consensus. That "opinion" is outdated. It's clear that someone else is beset by dogma. Bodhiupasaka (talk) 09:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great, then provide sources that say it's outdated. That's how an encyclopedia does things. It presents ALL views and gives a history of them. After all, 2014 was so long ago. Skyerise (talk) 12:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Formulas for Recitation[edit]

I have just checked back on this page and see that it’s gone. Why is the section gone? Emperor of Vietnam (talk) 23:34, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]