User talk:AK63

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello AK63, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. You also might want to consider being "adopted" by an experienced user who would show you how wikipedia works through a program called adopt-a-user. Danger (talk) 14:32, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, AK63. You have new messages at Talk:Snake.
Message added 14:32, 22 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Danger (talk) 14:32, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"thank you for having taken action! However, I am STILL noticing that in the left-hand-side frame, category 4-Biology-subcategory number: 4.4.1, MOLTING still appears with an 'O' (moUlting)...Your additonal corrective step is much appreciated!" AKAK63 (talk) 21:55, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I missed that section. Fixed now. Feel free in the future to be bold and make corrections yourself. You are an editor too! Danger (talk) 22:55, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Politically Correct/All -Inclusive Term (Variation) for GLBT/LBGT: GLBTQQI/LBGTQQI[edit]

Hello any Wikipedia editors out there.

I can't understand or accept the fact that no one has given apparent thought to or mentioned ADDING the initial 'I' (for: Intersexual-the politically correct term for the outdated term: hermaphrodite/androgynous) to the acronym. Could any editor kindly add this to the page which discusses VARIATIONS of LGBT/GLBT (at: https://www.qudswiki.org/?query=LGBT#Variants)? Thank you.

P.S. the 2 Qs are for Queer & Questioning-however the individual chooses his/her identity &/or definition to be

Awaiting your early responses (&, even more so, your advising me of your corrective action in the spirit of what I've stated) with thanks in advance, AK63 (talk) 08:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)AK63 08-17-2013 01:32am[reply]

June 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. An edit you recently made to Atlantic Ocean seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 09:10, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015[edit]

Hello, BracketBot:

Yhank you for your comments.I am NOT sure at all what they mean &, due to very LIMITED time, have seen your comments only now (namely, very late after posted) given the fact that I am (myself, not in great health) the only caregiver for a disabled person at home & unfortunately, cannot indulge in spending as much time as I'd like on Wikepedia contributions 7 learning the rules/ how to post, etc...but rather, most spontaneously/sporadically when time & energy allow...So, hoping you understand my rather dire circumstances, I'd much appreciate if you KEPT my LINGUISTICALLY BASED/SOUND contribution (content) & rather introduced whatever formatcorrection is necessary. I'd very much appreciate it! :)

Well wishes to you & kind thanks! (talk) 3:05am, 5 February 2015 (PST)

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Zabur may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • sound of the voiceless & voiced letters: p & b, respectively, between Hebrew & Arabic)."<ref>Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament, vol. 1, pg. 245.</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:32, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What on Earth is not a reliable source[edit]

See WP:RS and this. We need reliably published source, in this case academic studies. Doug Weller talk 18:47, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]