User talk:Closingbracket

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Closingbracket, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Closingbracket! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 13 June 2020 (UTC)


Stubs[edit]

Thank you for your recent edit to Favartia natalensis, but please take care not to add {{stub}} to an article which already has a specific stub tag, and remember that all stub tags go at the foot of the article, not the top - see WP:ORDER. Thanks. PamD 19:00, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Closingbracket! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Notable Article Help?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ClosingBracketBot[edit]

The bot has been shut down and is no longer active. -- Closingbracket (talk) 09:05, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

4 vs 4im[edit]

Hi, I'm not sure if this was purposeful but you gave a level 4im warning after a level 4 warning.

Please note that level 4im warnings are meant to be only warnings and 4s are meant to be final. It's either or, not both.

Thanks and happy editing :D --Ferien (talk) 19:56, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ferien: Ah, thank you for the clarification; I wasn't exactly sure what it meant seeming as how they are next to each other in the selection. I'd assume that one should flag the user if vandalism continues after a level 4 warning, in that case. Thanks :) Closingbracket (talk) 20:00, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it's 1, 2, 3, 4 then report. Or 4im then report. :) --Ferien (talk) 20:01, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for adding the IMDb source to my edit on Steve Pendleton. I truly appreciate it. SbbPendlton (talk) 20:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SbbPendlton: Yes, that's fine; thanks for including the source in your comment, though adding sources is helpful. Thanks, happy editing :) Closingbracket (talk) 20:09, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Great job RC patrolling today. You beat me to reverts a couple of times :-) –Novem Linguae (talk) 21:26, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The BFG edit[edit]

I don't understand why my edit was tagged as vandalism - the Fleshlumpeater clearly stated this in the movie. Could you tell me why? Thanks. 92.237.102.75 (talk) 20:17, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@92.237.102.75: Apologies, this was my mistake; I was reviewing another edit - of actual vandalism - and mixed it up with yours. I've removed the warning from your talk page and you may undo my revert. Sorry, thank you, and happy editing Closingbracket (talk) 20:27, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. And I accept your apology :) 92.237.102.75 (talk) 21:35, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with my edit?[edit]

Hello, I saw that you reverted my edits because of MOS issues, but could you please explain to me what the specific issues are? I now know about the COI notice but what about the other changes I made to the article in the Features section? -- Cosmic (talk) 03:36, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, this is a known issue with the reverting system, however the information that was accidentally removed has since been replaced by other editors, and you received no warning with the revert. Thank you, Closingbrackettalk 12:48, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I've just re-inspected the case now. I'd ask that you read Wikipedia's actual guidelines on conflict of interest, as well as the guidelines on harassment and identification. In regards to your edit being reverted, see my previous message; I do not believe any further action is required there on your part. Thanks, Closingbrackettalk 14:09, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]