User talk:Krajoyn
July 2017
Your recent editing history at Second Italo-Ethiopian War shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Favonian (talk) 17:21, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
- Hello Krajoyn. I've asked you to take your edits to the talk page for discussion, but you have instead violated the 3 revert rule and offered no discussion. Please consider discussion conflicting/controversial edits in the future. -Indy beetle (talk) 17:30, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 19:34, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Krajoyn, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Krajoyn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:03, 29 July 2017 (UTC) |
Edit warring at Second Italo-Ethiopian War
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:34, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Resumed edit-warring
You have chosen to resume the kind of disruptive behavior for which you were recently blocked, in particular your unwillingness to discuss your controversial changes. One more revert and you'll be blocked indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 18:58, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
August 2017
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 19:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Krajoyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #18900 was submitted on Aug 02, 2017 20:09:27. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 20:09, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Your emails of June 7
Dear Krajoyn/Anti Social/dex dex:
I am sorry I didn't see your emails earlier. If they hadn't come from such odd names, names I didn't recognize, I might have read them earlier. I understand you have a privacy concern, which however is based on a misreading of our policy; see Wikipedia:CheckUser#CheckUser_and_the_privacy_policy. Nothing that was disclosed is in any way in violation of our policy. I find it amusing, of course, that you would try to claim someone has invaded your privacy--the easiest way to prevent even the possibility of that is to not abuse Wikipedia on an ongoing basis. Have a wonderful holiday season, Drmies (talk) 16:47, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
SPI link
Convenience link to SPI, since I keep losing it: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Krajoyn.