User talk:Pablo180
Welcome to Wikipedia! We could really use your help to create new content, but your recent additions do not assert the notability of their subjects and have been reverted or removed. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
Pablo180 I would like to know where you found the information on how many pubs there were in Lambley over 100 years ago, and if you have more information. I am tracing a family tree and one person was a licencee of an old pub in Lambley. Please respond by leaving a message on the user page assigned to my ip address, or respond to that address if you have that tech knowledge. Thanks.
Paul G Tait[edit]
Thanks for spotting this. I've deleted it as an obvious attack page. Since I don't want to draw attention to whoever is being attacked here, I'm going to delist and delete your nomination page as well, I hope you don't mind. Again, well spotted and thanks.--Docg 01:07, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
No problem. Pablo180 01:15, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Elite Cinema, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking 19:54, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
CO2[edit]
CO2 is 0.038% of the current atmosphere. Your percentages were never correct. Dragons flight 02:09, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
If you go and take a look at the King David Hotel bombing article since your edit and read the comments about terrorism in its Discussion page, you'll see why the content about how the bombing was the most lethal 'terrorist attack' until the 80s was couched around with qualifications. Congratulations for achieving its deletion again. -- ZScarpia (talk) 17:28, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
LimeWire[edit]
The "fields that are not well covered by print sources" exception still requires the sources to be reliable. WP:V, under Self-published sources, states that "...forum postings, and similar sources are largely not acceptable." You can use electronic sources, but they have to be published by reliable and verifiable news organizations or the like, not forum topics.
With that said, most of the stuff in that section was original research, especially the last line, "...much of the criticism and bad press that Limewire receives is a direct result of these websites." There is no solid (again, reliable) proof of that. You can't make statements like that and try to back them up with forum posts; that doesn't work around here. However, if you can find an article by a website like Network World or CNET stating that this is indeed true, then feel free to bring back the section.