User talk:KingTiger1611

Welcome!

Hello, KingTiger1611, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Also, try visiting the [[WP:PINOY|Philippine notice board for info on collaborating on Philippine-related articles. If you have more questions, click "duck" at the end of this message. --Howard the Duck 04:50, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UST and the Spanish monarchs[edit]

you were asking for more relevant facts regarding the contribution of the spanish monarchy to ust? is former ust rector now archbishop leonardo legaspi not a credible source? aren't you familiar with the history of your own alma mater?

ust was under the spanish supervision for nearly 300 years, so it is just apt to give preponderance to that regime by putting that article here.

To quote my original stand on your facts, "Though this addition is very very informative, we should also feature other periods such as the American and Japanese regimes. Putting this good article, however, makes the history section of the University unbalanced. Since you look game enough in contributing information in Wikipedia, my advices are to let your additions sit for a while until representations from other regimes (stated above) are also cited, and research for more relevant facts especially in history. Thank you very much. By the way, where did find this article? May I know? Thanks again."

I have been editing UST's Wiki since 2006. In fact, I made the List of University of Santo Tomas student organizations, University of Santo Tomas seals and emblems, and University of Santo Tomas student life and culture. If you can see the list of the Past Rectors of the University in the People page of UST, it's because I also added them straight from the Varsitarian paper. I'm even planning to visit the UST Heritage Library and the UST Archives soon just for the sake of getting reliable facts. Though your contribution is very essential, it somehow breaks the continuity of the History section of the University.

I'm not questioning the credibility of your source. I just want to see/read the book for my own. Pampi1010 (talk) 30 October 2008

the title of the entry was "the university and the spanish monarchs" so, understandably, it can stand on its own without considering other regimes. that would not mean of historical imbalance. why worry of disregarding the history of the university under the american period when you can add another entry soley for that period? i started the ust entry here in wikipedia wayback in march 2005 after learning that there was no entry for ust. im happy that it evolved tremendously. going back to the article, it was sourced from former rector now archbishop leonardo legaspi. --House of bourbon (talk) 03:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How can you not consider other regimes if they're just as important as the one you're pushing. Well, if that's really what you want, we can remove now the other colleges leaving only the Faculty of Civil Law and Faculty of Medicine and Surgery since they're the only colleges in the University that continuously bring glory to UST. What if I'll replace the UST's Athletic section with the stories from the 90's four-peat era and the Season 69 because they're one of the most remarkable, wouldn't we sound incomplete and bias? Universities with their Wiki's on the Featured list such as Cornell, Dartmouth, and Duke concisely cited their university's equally historic past. Let's not get too far, just look at the Ateneo way of telling the readers their beginnings. Ateneo Wikipedians were able to mention all the periods of their school's past, from its foundation down to its recent history, and not dwelling from its Spanish origins. For me, it's just all or nothing.

A few editors are contending this section, each having their own disputed points. I'm after the evenness while they're for the proper citation, and no one is after the source's credibility.

umm.. ??I don't know if I'm talking to the same person.?? --Pampi1010 (talk) 07:55, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you didn't understand my point, did you? and please, don't give me the impression that ateneo is the archetypal entry for a university here in wikipedia let alone other universities. if you want to feature ust's history under the american and japanese regime, then go, do it yourself. i am giving preponderance on the spanish regime for obvious reason and as a thomasian, you ought to know the contribution of the spanish regime to ust's existence. this is not to say that i am disregarding the other regime. you seem too conceited on your faculty of medicine and surgery, lol. --House of bourbon (talk) 09:55, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As much as I want to feature the University's history from day 1, I just can't. Valid resources are so limited. The current University administration only imprints the same old stories and facts (1611, royal, pontifical, catholic, and pope visits) to the students. Your find was actually a delight to fanatics and Wikipedians alike. But again, I think it's better if we'd get it done concisely - like what we have now - or get it comprehensively. No in-betweens. You may want to search for more historic facts and put them into a new Wiki account. Thank you. --Pampi1010 (talk) 04:05, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History of University of Santo Tomas[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of History of University of Santo Tomas, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: University of Santo Tomas. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:07, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting articles[edit]

Hi. :) I happened to be watching Coren's talk page and saw your note to him there. I wanted to just drop you an explanation on how to properly divide articles on Wikipedia. As Wikipedia:Split sets out, when we split material, we have to provide a direct link to the source article. This is necessary because Wikipedia's contributors do not release their material into public domain, but retain rights to authorship under the terms of GFDL. This wikilink satisfies that requirement by allowing readers to access the history and see who contributed what and when. Usually, we put into the edit summary something along the lines of "Split from Sourcearticle". Then, we note the split as well in an edit summary at the source article. That would read like "Material split to destination article", in this case. This helps make sure that the article is not later deleted, as it cannot be as long as the article to which the material has been split remains. I have fixed the problems with this split, but I wanted to let you know for future use. Thanks, and if you have any questions about this, please feel free to leave a line at my talk page. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:17, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Old UST Side Entrance.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Old UST Side Entrance.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 13:34, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Old UST Side Entrance.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Old UST Side Entrance.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J Milburn (talk) 14:08, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Miguel_de_Benavides.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Miguel_de_Benavides.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of History of University of Santo Tomas[edit]

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article History of University of Santo Tomas you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Thelb ⁴ 07:44, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Thelb4! Thank you for allotting some in time in reviewing the said article! While you're checking the article, I hope you'll learn a lot of new things from the history of our University. I have some questions though.

First, I tried to leave comments on your talk page, but I can't seem to find the proper section where I can leave them. I'm not well-versed in Wiki.
You said you're going to review the article, does that mean you're also editing?

Thanks. --Pampi1010 (talk) 08:14, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. For leaving messages on my talk page, just start a new section (at the top, next to 'edit this page').

I've reviewed it, and noticed there are a few things that need to be done before I can pass it. They are detailed at the article's talk page. I will also make a few small edits to the article (but not right away, I haven't got time). If you have any questions, go to my talk page. Thelb ⁴ 08:25, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have significantly edited the article. Changes are listed on its talk page. Thanks again Thelb4!--Pampi1010 (talk) 13:27, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:College of Commerce box.jpg)[edit]

You've uploaded File:College of Commerce box.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:20, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem[edit]

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --19:57, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:World_Youth_Day_1995_in_UST.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:World_Youth_Day_1995_in_UST.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bluemask (talk) 04:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:USTseal1957b.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:USTseal1957b.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. PhilKnight (talk) 18:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:USTseal1957a.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:USTseal1957a.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. PhilKnight (talk) 18:44, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:UST_Mountaineering.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:UST_Mountaineering.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. PhilKnight (talk) 20:43, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:USTPhilosophy.gif[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:USTPhilosophy.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. PhilKnight (talk) 12:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:UST SOCC.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:UST SOCC.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:12, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:UST Yellow Jackets.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:UST Yellow Jackets.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:08, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:UST1619.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:UST1619.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:22, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

University of Santo Tomas seals and emblems[edit]

First thing to do is to go to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Santo Tomas seals and emblems and explain why you think the article should not be deleted. Then you need to read WP:N and bring the article up to standards. You need to find multiple, reliable, independent (i.e. non University) sources that discuss this topic to establish that it meets wikipedia's inclusion criteria. If you fix the article so it is inline with basic policies, other users will most likely recognize that and vote to keep the article. Otherwise, it will probably be deleted. Sorry, but I hope this helps.-Andrew c ^[talk] 03:18, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:USTCRSshield.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:USTCRSshield.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:25, 4 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:25, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:USTITHMshield.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:USTITHMshield.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:USTIPEAbox.jpg, File:USTFMSshield.jpg, File:USTEngineering100.jpg, File:USTEngineering.jpg, and File:USTCivilLawshield.png too. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem...[edit]

...just go ahead and recreate it as you see fit. There was no text and I thought it may ahve been a test page. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:18, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It has been quite a while since I created an article. Thanks again!Pampi1010 (talk) 01:35, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You betcha. Looks as if you've already done so. Have fun and a merry Christmas as well. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:44, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks as if it had been deleted per community consensus because of improper use of non-free images. Let me run the idea about restoring it with proper content by the admin's noticeboard. Can't do it now, but I will a little later, hopefully by the time you get this message. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:17, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Ust old entrance.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ust old entrance.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:16, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Santisimo Rosario Parish.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Santisimo Rosario Parish.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Magog the Ogre (talk) 13:44, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Santisimo Rosario Parish.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Santisimo Rosario Parish.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:12, 18 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:12, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of University of Santo Tomas student organizations for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article List of University of Santo Tomas student organizations, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of University of Santo Tomas student organizations until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 04:07, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tagalog help needed[edit]

Hello Pampi1010, I'm contacting you because we need some Tagalog translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on tl.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Tagalog Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 18:36, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Ust old entrance.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ust old entrance.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:42, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:UST Intramuros Old Side.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:UST Intramuros Old Side.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:43, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Colleges of the University of Santo Tomas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dominican. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, KingTiger1611. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 21:20, 4 September 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 21:20, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, KingTiger1611. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 16:18, 5 September 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 16:18, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, KingTiger1611. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 20:53, 6 September 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 20:53, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to University of Santo Tomas Institute of Physical Education and Athletics may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It was established in 1929. The institute is located at the UST [[Quadricentennial Pavilion. [[Pope John Paul II]] is the the patron of IPEA.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:28, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited University of Santo Tomas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One More Chance. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate[edit]

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter. Feel free to participate in the journal.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

Publish an article to the journal. Even a medical student like you can make a submission.
Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
Join the editorial board.
Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
- Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
Technical work like template designing for the journal.
Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to updateswijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikaelwikiversityjournal.org.
Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reachwikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

Diptanshu^Talk 06:25, 12 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Pampi1010. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of UST Baccalaureate Mass for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UST Baccalaureate Mass is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UST Baccalaureate Mass until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Izno (talk) 16:49, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Traditions of the University of Santo Tomas for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Traditions of the University of Santo Tomas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traditions of the University of Santo Tomas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Izno (talk) 16:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Pampi1010. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kent Lao for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kent Lao is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kent Lao until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 12:49, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Pampi1010. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Traditions of the University of Santo Tomas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chippy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Thomasian Welcome Walk[edit]

Hello, Pampi1010

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Thomasian Welcome Walk, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomasian Welcome Walk.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:53, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:UST Growling Tigers[edit]

Hello.
I would like to invite you to join the discussion at Talk:UST Growling Tigers regarding the removal of roster tables of the varsity teams of the UST Growling Tigers.
Your input will be of great help.
Thanks.
NRT^530 (talk) 13:12, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Traditions of the University of Santo Tomas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One More Chance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited UP–UST rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Gordon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:20, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UST[edit]

Please read through WP:EXISTING. We do not include unlinked text in templates. If you make an article on these subjects then it can be included in the nav template. Please do not re-add unlinked text again as you did here. If you have questions, let me know. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 17:07, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Awards and prizes of the University of Santo Tomas moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Awards and prizes of the University of Santo Tomas, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 21:28, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thomasian Welcome Walk[edit]

Hello, Pampi1010,

I noticed your request at WP:REFUND. If you go to this redirect, you can find the past history in the edit history of the page before it was turned into a redirect. You can find your edits from 2019 there. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:35, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Draft:Thomasian Welcome Walk. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 16:05, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 17[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited University of Santo Tomas System, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rector.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Colleges of the University of Santo Tomas[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Colleges of the University of Santo Tomas you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArnabSaha -- ArnabSaha (talk) 19:01, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Colleges of the University of Santo Tomas[edit]

The article Colleges of the University of Santo Tomas you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Colleges of the University of Santo Tomas for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArnabSaha -- ArnabSaha (talk) 06:41, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:UST Baccalaureate Mass[edit]

Hello, Pampi1010. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:UST Baccalaureate Mass, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:UST Baccalaureate Mass[edit]

Hello, Pampi1010. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "UST Baccalaureate Mass".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:09, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:UST Baccalaureate Mass[edit]

Hello, Pampi1010. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "UST Baccalaureate Mass".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of University of Santo Tomas in popular culture for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article University of Santo Tomas in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Santo Tomas in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:22, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:UST Baccalaureate Mass[edit]

Hello, Pampi1010. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "UST Baccalaureate Mass".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:52, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Sy Sr. Hall (University of Santo Tomas) moved to draftspace[edit]

An discussed on my talk page, I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:53, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Henry Sy Sr. Hall[edit]

Hello, Pampi1010. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Henry Sy Sr. Hall, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re: UST articles[edit]

Calm down. There's no need for exaggerations over the articles' "deaths". I was just trying to improve the articles, especially the history article which was last reviewed in 2009 (more than 10 years ago). Remember that you do not own the articles in question, but feel free to modify or revert my edits if it is necessary. Good luck on your major exam btw. :) 07:36, 20 May 2023 (UTC) Itsquietuptown ✉️📜 07:36, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of University of Santo Tomas[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article University of Santo Tomas you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 01:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of University of Santo Tomas[edit]

The article University of Santo Tomas you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:University of Santo Tomas for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 15:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:UST Martyrs' Monument[edit]

I have moved UST Martyrs' Monument to draftspace at Draft:UST Martyrs' Monument. This article is very far from ready for mainspace when there is a single reference that barely discusses the tower. Please find significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. I recommend submitting the draft for review when you are ready. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:50, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your ongoing improvements to this draft. Please be aware that The Varsitarian would not be considered a secondary source independent of the subject. As such, the draft as of this version is still dramatically missing supporting sources. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:45, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]