Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States presidential election in District of Columbia, 2016

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

United States presidential election in District of Columbia, 2016[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It feels like an unneccicary expansion to the 2016 election page, rather than it's own page. OrangeYoshi99 (talk) 22:59, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm putting it back because the article is part of a series of articles on the election results of the all the primaries in the 50 states, six territories and the District of Columbia. See below:

Arglebargle79 (talk) 17:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 02:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 02:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep perhaps as I've noticed several articles with states-focused pages and this seems acceptable, no serious needs for deletion. Notifying DGG for analysis. SwisterTwister talk 05:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. On the same basis as the others. If there aren;t much in the way or sources now, there very soon will be. Tje missing ones should be started as soon as possible. DGG ( talk ) 09:39, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per comments of SwisterTwister and DGG. May need some cleanup, but no need for deletion. There is clearly a precedent and justification for this type of article.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 20:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.