Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Salt Lake Temple, Utah

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Salt Lake Temple, Utah[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2012 at 10:51:33 (UTC)

Original – The Salt Lake Temple of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Reason
Large clear image of a notable subject.
Articles in which this image appears
Salt Lake Temple, Temple Square, Holy of Holies (LDS Church)
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator
Diliff
Recolored version Alt 1

The original is used in Temple Square and Holy of Holies (LDS Church), and Alt 1 is used in the Salt Lake Temple article. Alt 1 is recolored.

  • Support either version as nominator --Pinetalk 10:51, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support alt 1 Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:14, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support alt 1 - EV ●Mehran Debate● 09:23, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Alt 1's colours are a bit unrealistic, and there is banding/posterization as well as blown highlights in the sky. If people prefer the high contrast look, I'm sure a better compromise can be found that doesn't have all of the above faults. I'll process the image from the originals and upload tonight maybe. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 17:07, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've uploaded an improved version over the top of the original, with more contrast, a bit of a saturation boost (but not as much as the alt), and a bit more pixels. You might need to refresh things to see it. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 16:58, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The sun is simply at the wrong angle. JJ Harrison (talk) 23:02, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support alt 1 Tomer T (talk) 09:15, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Lighting just isn't right. Clegs (talk) 09:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per JJ & Clegs. Nikthestoned 16:23, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Weird sun spots on temple. —Eustress talk 19:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Photographed with sun in a poor location. Alt 1 over-exposed. Sun spots, but no lens flare. DavidH (talk) 22:11, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per DavidH. --99of9 (talk) 23:09, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 11:09, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]