User contributions for 24.126.244.19

For 24.126.244.19 talk block log logs filter log
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

11 August 2023

2 April 2023

12 February 2023

  • 11:2311:23, 12 February 2023 diff hist +347 User talk:24.126.244.19→‎February 2022: Reply Tag: Reply
  • 11:0811:08, 12 February 2023 diff hist −48 Zheng HeUndid revision 1138920488 by Adakiko (talk) List them on the page then. You cannot used the 2010 ref which has no ref of its own. Can't just claim 700 years from now that someone's mother was a prostitute in 2023. There has to be a reference from the time. Got any? If not, be gone. Tags: Undo Reverted
  • 10:5310:53, 12 February 2023 diff hist −48 Zheng HeNo reference from the period mentions that "Zheng He" was a Eunuch. The 2010 writer doesn't reference his words or explain how he concluded that Zheng He was a Eunuch. You have to provide a chinese reference that dates back to the period when "Zheng He" lived. Tag: Reverted
  • 10:4310:43, 12 February 2023 diff hist −52 Eunuchs in ChinaNo reference from the period mentions that "Zheng He" was a Eunuch. You can list some of the other Eunuchs that have gained power as you mentioned. Who? List some of the names and provide Chinese references from that time. Tag: Reverted
  • 10:4110:41, 12 February 2023 diff hist −49 EunuchNo reference from the period mentions that "Zheng He" was a Eunuch. You can list some of the other Eunuchs that have gained power as you mentioned. Who? List some of the names and provide Chinese references from that time. Tag: Reverted

4 February 2023

  • 03:4003:40, 4 February 2023 diff hist +257 Early Muslim conquestsRun a DNA test to find out if yours contains the same haplogroup type as the poem's fabricator. You're not going to gain much by removing a comment and hide what will be common knowledge in time. Did you know that Issac was the child of a slave and is claimed by Sarah as a legitimate son as well as 4 children of Jacob (later named Israel) were sons of handmaid servant women that belonged to close family members of the same clan. Even Sarah's mother was a servant woman of low status. Tag: Reverted
  • 03:0903:09, 4 February 2023 diff hist +257 Early Muslim conquestsMany of Ferdowsi's writing are lost and many more are attributed to him falsely. The reader must become familiar with the facts that these versus as well as many others are disputed and could have been fabrications (otherwise, the versus would be considered anti Islamic propaganda from hundreds of years ago that you support). Resource is included detailing that it is a fact that scholars are in disagreement about many of Ferdowsi's writings. Tags: Undo Reverted

3 February 2023

16 October 2022

9 October 2022

24 September 2022

18 September 2022

17 September 2022

  • 08:2408:24, 17 September 2022 diff hist −35 Al-Adiyat→‎Text: This is Arabia, they've been attacking at dawn for centuries, they all know this. It is not attacking an unaware enemy. The reason, they attack at dawn is because when the sun is fully risen, the battle is over until the next dawn, unless you want to die with your horse from heat exhaustion.

14 August 2022

21 July 2022

  • 12:1112:11, 21 July 2022 diff hist −1,709 Philip the ArabThe kneeling Roman was Valerian as he was captured by the Persian king while Philip the Arab if it is him depicted is shown handing over something to the Persian while standing. The source indicates that :The identity of these has been a matter of dispute among scholars (see Herrmann and Curtis; Meyer, pp. 240-47, 300-301; Overlaet, pp. 461-63). It was B. C. McDermot that claimed that it is Philip who is kneeling (this is NOT a source - its an twisted claim, baseless. Do you have real sources? Tags: Undo Reverted
  • 11:0611:06, 21 July 2022 diff hist −1,709 Philip the ArabUndid revision 1099552572 by T8612 (talk) The sculpture might as well be Jesus hoping to receive Persian support against Roman control in the area. Most likely it is a Jewish leader submitting to a Persian king for the same reason. There are no valid records that specifically declare that this sculpture is for Philip the Arab. If there are, list them here with page numbers. Tags: Undo Reverted
  • 10:4610:46, 21 July 2022 diff hist −1,709 Philip the ArabUndid revision 1099453906 by Furius (talk) List your sources that it is Philip the Arab depicted in the sculpture.It has to be from the period.Not a source of an assumption or determination by some researcher/writer in modern times.Some sources claim that it is it might be Philip the Arab and they are not from that period.One source is from 2017, 5 years ago.That's not a source, that's a fabrication or someone's own creation.Show real sources Tags: Undo Reverted

20 July 2022

23 June 2022

23 May 2022

  • 23:1423:14, 23 May 2022 diff hist −24 Banu SahmJust Arabia. You don't say Alexander the Great is from Turkey because he was born near Constantinople which is in Turkey now.

23 April 2022

21 April 2022

14 April 2022

  • 08:1108:11, 14 April 2022 diff hist −1,709 Philip the Arab→‎Accession to the throne: Fabricated info. Here is the correct ref: "The identity of these has been a matter of dispute among scholars (see Herrmann and Curtis; Meyer, pp. 240-47, 300-301; Overlaet, pp. 461-63)." Also: "Šāpur himself refers to three Roman emperors in his Res Gestae (ŠKZ): Gordian III, Philip the Arab, and Valerian" - So, we understand that even though Šāpur' records mention Philip the Arab since they did exist during the same period, he is not in the sculpture. Tag: Reverted
  • 06:0706:07, 14 April 2022 diff hist −42 Rashid ad-Din Sinan→‎Biography: Fabrication? List your reference for the claim. Tag: Reverted

8 April 2022

  • 04:2704:27, 8 April 2022 diff hist +14 Abd al-Rahman ibn Abd Allah al-GhafiqiIn Arabic, Abdul is not a name, it is Abd Al-?????(followed by the second name - Abd Alrahman or Abd Al-Rahman). The pronunciation is dependent on grammar rules as the equivalent of vowels (that do not exist in Arabic) are altered based on the sentence structure. It is incorrect to write the name as Abdul. I've made the correction here, but it should be corrected on every page of Wikipedia automatically as well as having auto replace while creating content. Tag: missing file added

7 April 2022

  • 21:1521:15, 7 April 2022 diff hist −37 Siege of Constantinople (717–718)→‎Siege: The refs do not contain the claim, instead, it is mentioned in the notes section with an external ref. You need to provide the external ref and page numbers. Also, you appear to have changed the claim from "the Arabs eating their own excrement" to "eating the dung of their animals" because your refs could not support the first claim. This shows that your only purpose is to incorporate a foul remark and associate it with an ethnic group. There is a name for doing this. Tag: Manual revert

6 April 2022

  • 07:1907:19, 6 April 2022 diff hist −1,113 Pact of Umar→‎Content: Taking the record out of context and twisting facts. The pact was self binding by the Christians of the city themselves (their leaders). Wording it in the form of POINTS, erases the factuality of the pact and turns it to an imposed set of rules. This is not true. There no refs that describe that the rules were indeed established by Omar for the Christians. Tag: Reverted

3 April 2022

2 April 2022

31 March 2022

30 March 2022

22 March 2022

20 March 2022

  • 16:4016:40, 20 March 2022 diff hist −50 HagarHateful and demeaning. Sarah was a slave and concubine in Egypt, but her page doesn't list that as her occupation. Tag: Reverted

8 March 2022

1 January 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)